<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>z on life - Latest Comments in General</title><link>http://zellunit.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:31:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The man with the golden cookie</title><link>http://zellunit.com/the-man-with-the-golden-cookie/#comment-437268</link><description>This resembles my sexual relationships with women.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hollerith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-432554</link><description>Excellent point, yeah scarily, I think most could coast. I mean, some people do that in a way right? It's all a matter of degree of personal attention, which is in itself just a continuous scale. That hits deeper ethical, moral, and existential questions though :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zellunit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-429043</link><description>excellent point. i didn't want to make a long post even longer by jumping into this, but you are probably correct and there's no way they could have sold. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that said, i still have faith that they are ballsy and would have gone for the homerun had the choice been 100% theres :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zellunit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-429009</link><description>Matt aren't you missing Matt Maroon's (obvious) point that Xobni could not sell even if the founders wanted to. Xobni did a VC round at around $10m post, how could they sell for only $20m?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, I wouldn't consider them that ballsy, if you have done a $5m round and are doing really well by many measure why would you settle for a $20m exit? I am sure they pay themselves more than enough to live happily.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">immad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-427899</link><description>Re: #4 I had the idea a few years back (before gmail) that it would be great to track all communications together (email + chat + comments + ?).  I believe Microsoft Journal was a shot at showing visual history, but it never took off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What scares me is you could take your example to the next level:  You assign the "Mom" category to your mom's email, and it automatically writes thank yous and that happy mother's day email you forgot to send!  How many of our relationships could coast on w/o user input?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gsiener</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:11:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Those Xobni guys are ballsy</title><link>http://zellunit.com/those-xobni-guys-are-ballsy/#comment-427892</link><description>My initial reaction would be to cash out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, with their vc funding it's likely a 1-2x return would not be significant for the investors. As well, if you are enjoying what you are working then the amount of money really doesn't matter. While at FB, Mark could have cashed out for the billions a long time ago but he was always satisfied to continue working/growing the product. To each his own.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noah</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ~2v2@GoW!!!~</title><link>http://zellunit.com/2v2gow/#comment-412974</link><description>Is it not unethical to deliberately cause a person to develop an addiction to something that does not help him control reality or his own mind in any way but is simply a distraction from reality?  Is this not like selling addictive drugs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Hollerith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:08:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>